Teaching Sketches

Assignments, discussion setups, and classroom experiments for courses that want to engage AI seriously, not just acknowledge it exists. The common thread is using AI to make student thinking more visible, more discussable, and sometimes a little stranger in useful ways.

How to read these

Treat each teaching sketch as adaptable rather than prescriptive. Some are quick classroom activities; others are assignment frames. The setup sections are there to make adaptation easier, and the caveats are often where the most useful teaching questions live.

Date Mar 2026 Status rough Type activity Time 20 min in class Level any
What Does Cilantro Taste Like?

model behaviorAI literacy

What Does Cilantro Taste Like?

Key questionHow to introduce students to the basics of AI output differences?

ActivityA hands-on demo to show how model size and settings change what AI says — using one simple, relatable question.

What students learn
  • AI is a spectrum of models, not one fixed thing
  • how temperature, token limits, and sampling shape output
  • what training data has to do with what a model knows
Date Apr 2026 Status rough Type activity Time ~30 min in class Level any
Argument Audit

writingargument

Argument Audit

Key questionHow can AI help sharpen writing skills instead of replace them?

ActivityStudents use AI-generated objections to test whether a thesis is vague, vulnerable, or genuinely persuasive.

What students learn
  • the difference between tone and analytical precision
  • what makes an objection substantive vs. generic
  • how vague writing produces vague critique
Date Apr 2026 Status lightly tested Type assignment Time 1–2 hours out of class Level anyone
Remixing Plato

philosophypromptinginterpretation

Remixing Plato

Key questionHow can AI help translate ideas into contemporary culture?

ActivityStudents translate, reshape, or re-perform a Platonic dialogue through AI — then analyze what changed and why.

What students learn
  • what AI can and cannot preserve in philosophical argument
  • how form and genre reshape meaning
  • that prompting requires the same clarity as writing
Date Mar 2026 Status refined Type activity Time 30–40 min in class Level any
Citation Test

source evaluationsource fabricationlibrary instruction

Citation Test

Key questionHow can AI output help students learn scholarly integrity?

ActivityAsk students to verify AI-generated citations so fabricated sources become a concrete lesson about evidence, authority, citation accuracy, and why LLMs can produce sources that sound real but do not exist.

What students learn
  • why polished prose is not evidence of accuracy
  • how hallucination happens and why it's convincing
  • verification is a scholarly habit that connects classroom work with library expertise
Date Apr 2026 Status refined Type activity Time 45–60 min in class Level any
Same Prompt, Different History

source evaluationfilter bubbleshistorical thinking

Same Prompt, Different History

Key questionThe same prompt to ChatGPT produces different histories depending on whether you're logged in or not — and that difference is the lesson.

ActivityThe same prompt to ChatGPT produces different histories depending on whether you're logged in or not — and that difference is the lesson.

What students learn
  • how context shapes historical interpretation
  • what filter bubbles look like in practice
  • the difference between pronouncing and puzzling about sources

Browse all sketchbook tags →