The second object is a fan painting showing nomadic horsemen hunting with falcons. The figures are spread across an open landscape, with several riders holding birds of prey while others appear to be observing or preparing to participate in the hunt. One rider is actively releasing a falcon, while the others remain positioned on horseback, which suggests that the scene captures a coordinated moment within a larger hunting activity rather than something random or isolated. What stands out most in the painting is how controlled and deliberate the activity looks. Falconry is not something that can be done casually, and the way the figures are arranged reflects that. The rider releasing the bird has to manage both the movement of the horse and the timing of the falcon, while the other riders maintain distance and awareness. That level of coordination suggests that each participant has a role, and that the hunt itself follows a structure. Instead of just being about catching prey, the scene reflects a process that depends on training, control, and repeated practice.
A falconry fan painting showing nomadic horsemen hunting with falcons across an open landscape. Source
Looking at falconry more closely helps explain why the scene appears so organized. Otsuka describes falconry as a “cooperative hunting method,” where both the human and the bird must be trained to respond to one another.1 That relationship is important because it means the success of the activity depends on communication and control rather than chance. The bird is not acting independently, and the hunter is not acting alone. Both are part of a system that has to be developed over time. That level of interaction makes falconry feel closer to a sport than simple hunting, since it involves skill, repetition, and technique. The long history of falconry also helps place the painting in a broader context. Research on raptor use in western China shows that falconry practices have deep roots in Central Asian and steppe cultures, where hunting with birds of prey was a well-established tradition.2 These practices were closely connected to the lifestyle of nomadic groups, who depended on mobility and knowledge of the environment. The presence of horseback riders in the painting reflects that background, since horses were essential for both travel and hunting across the steppe. The combination of horseback riding and falconry suggests a form of activity that required multiple skills at once, reinforcing the idea that it was highly developed.
A prince holding a falcon, showing the close connection between falconry and elite life. Source
Another important aspect of falconry is its connection to elite culture. While hunting could serve practical purposes, falconry in particular became associated with wealth and status. Falconry often required significant time, training, and resources, which suggests it was not easily accessible to everyone. The presence of multiple riders in the painting also suggests that the activity could involve coordinated group participation rather than a single individual. That kind of setting points to falconry as something that was organized and practiced at a higher level, rather than only being used for basic subsistence. The same source notes that falconry originated in Central Asia and later expanded into China, the Middle East, and other parts of Eurasia.3 Because nomadic groups were already highly mobile, they played a major role in carrying these practices across long distances. Additional research confirms that falconry remained culturally significant in western China, showing that it continued to be practiced and adapted over time.4 This pattern of movement is important because it shows how activities like falconry were not limited to one place, but instead became part of a shared cultural tradition.
In that sense, the painting represents more than just a moment of hunting. It reflects a structured and skill-based activity that required training, coordination, and social organization. At the same time, the spread of falconry across different regions connects it directly to the movement of ideas and practices along the Silk Road. Falconry shows how a single activity could develop in one area and then be carried across cultures, where it continued to evolve while still maintaining its core features.
Noriko Otsuka, “Falconry: Tradition and Acculturation,” International Journal of Sport and Health Science 4 (2006): 198. ↩
R. MaMing et al., “Raptor Conservation and Culture in the West of China,” Ela Journal 3, no. 1 (2014): 24. ↩
Otsuka, “Falconry,” 198. ↩
MaMing et al., “Raptor Conservation and Culture,” 24. ↩